I wrote this shortly after the terrorist attack on 9/11. In my euphoria over American’s newfound patriotism in the wake of that horrific event, I felt the time was right for my idea. Sadly, it didn’t last too long. Perhaps I was premature or naïve; perhaps I still am. It obviously never caught on; it probably never will. Still, the sentiment that drove my suggestion remains with me, and I still embrace the idea wholeheartedly. Ironically, I feel the change is needed now, in 2010, more than ever, given the ideological struggle that consumes our beleaguered nation. Those among us who stand for freedom and justice, who oppose tyranny and privilege, would do well to adopt my suggestion and make it their own. These trying times certainly call for it.
A groundswell of patriotism in the wake of terrorist attacks on the continental United States has the all the sincerity and fervor of a religious revival. Nationalism is sweeping away the old partisanship, replacing it with an uncommon unity and a quiet resolve.
In truth, it is refreshing to see Americans show proper respect for their country and its institutions. It has been absent for too long. The sad thing is that it takes a tragedy like this to bring out the best in Americans.
The newly found respect for everything American extends to the flag and the Pledge of Allegiance as well. People seem genuinely engaged and moved when reciting those profound words of commitment, rather than muttering some meaningless mummery, as they appeared to be before September 11.
Perhaps it is time for Congress to consider a joint resolution altering the pledge once again, as it has done in the past. Given the prolonged battle that lies ahead against terrorism in all its guises, the pledge needs an additional edge, a little more ‘teeth’ to it.
By adding a terse phrase at the end, the pledge becomes even more suitable for the times in which we live. Consider the addition of the phrase “who fight for it” at the end of the present pledge to demonstrate our willingness—nay, our eagerness—to fight for freedom, as we have done in the past.
The newly amended pledge would read:
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands: one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all who fight for it.
Considering that liberty and justice always come at a price and that we will all be asked to pay that price, to make that sacrifice over the coming months and years, this addition becomes completely proper. Even in times of peace, the phrase would continue to articulate the willingness of Americans to engage the enemies of liberty. It reflects the indomitable nature of the American spirit and the mindset that has made this country great.
Think about it.
While I agree that liberty and justice belong to only those who fight for it, I’m not sure how this applies to 9/11. The pledge is one of allegiance to the state, a state whose foreign policies are indirectly responsible for what occurred on 9/11. Had we stuck to Washington’s counsel of free trade and non-interventionism, there wouldn’t have been a 9/11. Unless America’s foreign policy changes, we can expect more 9/11s in the future, I’m certain.
Since retro seems to be all the rage these days, how about bringing back the nazi style salute along with it.
In all serious though, I can see the sincerity in what you are posting, but have you read anything about the history of the pledge, it’s founder or his intentions?
http://www.lewrockwell.com/dilorenzo/dilorenzo54.html